SGS for 2004

Superhai · 15-02-2005, 15:08

SGS best result ever 2004
SGS result for 2004 was MSEK 279, SGS best result ever. All SGS regions have contributed to the positive development, which is MSEK 352 better than plan. The positive result is due to volumes and products, activities transferred from SAS Technical Services as well as some major one-off financial effects.
SGS revenue increased to MSEK 6 211, which is 11 percent better than 2003. The unit cost continues to decrease in all SGS regions: by 9 percent during the last two years. Productivity is also better than planned.

The volume of weighted landings was at 545,343 slightly over budget.

Full Time Employees were 7,028, which is 179 less than plan.

Price pressure on the market
The ground handling market has been under severe price pressure during 2004. A trend is appearing where airline alliances choose a common ground handler.

All agreements with SK/BU were handled regionally within SGS, with support from the central KAM organization. In connection with the negotiations it was established that the three Scandinavian SGS companies should establish joint projects with SK/BU to identify savings that can give SK lower prices. A first phase of these projects shall be ready during the first quarter of 2005.

Many customer contracts were renegotiated during the year. There were also a number of new customer airlines, of which the larger contracts were with Pakistan Airlines in Manchester and with Virgin Atlantic for CDC services in Bangkok.

A hectic 2004
In the beginning of 2004 a number of tasks within aircraft servicing were transferred to SGS from SAS Technical Services, including staff, equipment and customer contracts.

SGS established own ramp handling in Helsinki August 25.

SAS Ground Equipment was transferred to SGS from SAS Technical Services July 1. In connection with the incorporation October 1, SGE was formed into regional companies in Scandinavia, with the Danish one as holding company.

SGS was legally made into a Group within the SAS Group October 1. By the end of the year it contained SAS Ground Services AB as a holding company and eight subsidiaries: SGS Denmark AS, SGS Norway A/S, SGS Sweden AB, SGS Finland Oy, SGS UK Lt and the three SAS Ground Equipment companies.

IS/IT issues
PACS is SGS' common system for check-in. Due to instability, the introduction of the system caused operational disruptions, but by the end of the year these were eliminated considerably.

A revision was made of SGS IS/IT cost. A savings potential of MSEK 116 was identified, and more than half of it was achieved 2004. The rest will be achieved 2005.

Outlook for 2005
Since the airline market struggles, the demand for lower prices will continue in 2005.

MSEK 296 remains to be achieved in Turnaround 2005, in part together with the Scandinavian Airlines/Braathens companies through LCC+ projects.

In 2005, SGS is expected to make at least a 2004 financial "repeat performance".

If you have any questions concerning the information above, please do not hesitate to contact Ann Billberg <mailto:Ann.Billberg-Jonsson@sas.se>.

COPYRIGHT © 2002 Scandinavian Airlines System.
Created by Elaine Boivie
Published by Elaine Boivie
Last updated 2005-02-11

CK · 15-02-2005, 15:14

ok, da har tydeligvis flyselskapene i gruppen betalt for mye for sine tjenester...

LN-MOW · 15-02-2005, 15:59

Quote:

Originally posted by Superhai
... and with Virgin Atlantic for CDC services in Bangkok.

Bruker Virgin Palco ?????

Superhai · 15-02-2005, 16:05

Quote:

Originally posted by LN-MOW

Bruker Virgin Palco ?????

[AIRCRAFT STATUS - BASIC ]AHASBA [ VS043/15FEB 15FEB05
[LGW LAS ] [ STD 1045 ATD 1037 Gate Flight Departed
[A/C GVLIP VS744 JWY 14/58/379 DepCtrl BKKKC KOM 14179
[-------------------------------------------------------- All weights in KGS --
[MRAW 379203 RAF ]123100A[ Maximum fuel capacity 159500
[MZFW ]242671[L TAX ]1000[
[MTOW ]377842[ TOF ]122100A[ Maximum allowed TOF 144935
[MLAW ]285762[ TF ]107000A[ ] [
[
[DOW 186582 Pantry code ]03[ Fuel density in use ] [
[DOI 418.0
[
[Crew ] 3/16A[ Crew code ]36[ Crew seat capacity 4/20
[
[A/C registration A/C owner A/C subtype Cabin version CPT version
[]GVLIP [ ]VS [ ]744[ ]744D [ ]1323 [
[
[ ] [
[
[------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[2.DOW/DOI 3.Crew 4.Pantry 5.Others 6.Conversion weights
[7.Cabin capacity reduction 8.Balance methods
[Command] [ Select] [

Superhai · 15-02-2005, 16:12

Quote:

Originally posted by CK
ok, da har tydeligvis flyselskapene i gruppen betalt for mye for sine tjenester...

Igjen for SGS skyld for at noen selskap i gruppen ikke klarer seg så bra.

LN-MOW · 15-02-2005, 16:17

!!!! Hva med en FRACT ogsaa ???

fkrlf · 15-02-2005, 19:18

Vel pengene går i samme kassa lell... Dessuten har jeg inntrykk av at SGS er konkurransedyktige på handlingen også.

Meget bra resultat er det dog.

15-02-2005, 19:37

Quote:

Originally posted by LN-MOW

Quote:

Originally posted by Superhai
... and with Virgin Atlantic for CDC services in Bangkok.

Bruker Virgin Palco ?????

Virginpalco får vi ikke håpe de bruker

20 25 27 13 09 07 95+d entry

morr · 15-02-2005, 21:49

noen som vet hvordan det gikk for SGS Norge ?Og er det noen av selskapene i SGS som taper penger?

LN-BIZ · 15-02-2005, 22:01

Quote:

Originally posted by CK
ok, da har tydeligvis flyselskapene i gruppen betalt for mye for sine tjenester...

HAHA CK!

Er redd ok redd for at prisen har vært forhandlet en rekke ganger til SK/BU store fordel. En annen ting er vel om det lønner seg å outsourse avdelinger som kan vise til slike tall.
SGS Norge gikk forøvrig best!

OHHH! The future is SOOO B R I G H T!!

FBU · 16-02-2005, 01:40

Quote:

Originally posted by Superhai

Quote:

Originally posted by LN-MOW

Bruker Virgin Palco ?????

[AIRCRAFT STATUS - BASIC ]AHASBA [ VS043/15FEB 15FEB05
[LGW LAS ] [ STD 1045 ATD 1037 Gate Flight Departed
[A/C GVLIP VS744 JWY 14/58/379 DepCtrl BKKKC KOM 14179
[-------------------------------------------------------- All weights in KGS --
[MRAW 379203 RAF ]123100A[ Maximum fuel capacity 159500
[MZFW ]242671[L TAX ]1000[
[MTOW ]377842[ TOF ]122100A[ Maximum allowed TOF 144935
[MLAW ]285762[ TF ]107000A[ ] [
[
[DOW 186582 Pantry code ]03[ Fuel density in use ] [
[DOI 418.0
[
[Crew ] 3/16A[ Crew code ]36[ Crew seat capacity 4/20
[
[A/C registration A/C owner A/C subtype Cabin version CPT version
[]GVLIP [ ]VS [ ]744[ ]744D [ ]1323 [
[
[ ] [
[
[------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[2.DOW/DOI 3.Crew 4.Pantry 5.Others 6.Conversion weights
[7.Cabin capacity reduction 8.Balance methods
[Command] [ Select] [

Er det lov å paste sider fra Loadcontrol ut på internet. jeg bryr meg egentlig ikke, men...

DY · 16-02-2005, 08:13

Quote:

Originally posted by LN-BIZ

Quote:

Originally posted by CK
ok, da har tydeligvis flyselskapene i gruppen betalt for mye for sine tjenester...

HAHA CK!

Er redd ok redd for at prisen har vært forhandlet en rekke ganger til SK/BU store fordel. En annen ting er vel om det lønner seg å outsourse avdelinger som kan vise til slike tall.
SGS Norge gikk forøvrig best!

OHHH! The future is SOOO B R I G H T!!

SGS Norge best...selvsagt. Ser ut til at SGS Norge, Widerøe, SAS Braathens...altså de store SAS selskapene i Norge leverer gode tall og penger i SAS sluket. Og siden SAS går med underskudd totalt så må det jo være et par plasser hvor det renner penger ut.....på tide å snøre igjen kanskje.

Klippe · 16-02-2005, 08:33

Dette er faktisk veldig bra. Med de marginene bør det være liv laget den dag SGS eventuelt trekker seg ut av SAS gruppen. SGS ansatte har da intet å frykte!

16-02-2005, 08:50

Quote:

Originally posted by FBU

Quote:

Originally posted by Superhai

Quote:

Originally posted by LN-MOW

Bruker Virgin Palco ?????

[AIRCRAFT STATUS - BASIC ]AHASBA [ VS043/15FEB 15FEB05
[LGW LAS ] [ STD 1045 ATD 1037 Gate Flight Departed
[A/C GVLIP VS744 JWY 14/58/379 DepCtrl BKKKC KOM 14179
[-------------------------------------------------------- All weights in KGS --
[MRAW 379203 RAF ]123100A[ Maximum fuel capacity 159500
[MZFW ]242671[L TAX ]1000[
[MTOW ]377842[ TOF ]122100A[ Maximum allowed TOF 144935
[MLAW ]285762[ TF ]107000A[ ] [
[
[DOW 186582 Pantry code ]03[ Fuel density in use ] [
[DOI 418.0
[
[Crew ] 3/16A[ Crew code ]36[ Crew seat capacity 4/20
[
[A/C registration A/C owner A/C subtype Cabin version CPT version
[]GVLIP [ ]VS [ ]744[ ]744D [ ]1323 [
[
[ ] [
[
[------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[2.DOW/DOI 3.Crew 4.Pantry 5.Others 6.Conversion weights
[7.Cabin capacity reduction 8.Balance methods
[Command] [ Select] [

Er det lov å paste sider fra Loadcontrol ut på internet. jeg bryr meg egentlig ikke, men...

Kan ikke se noe galt med det, hva er hemmelig her ??

LN-MOW · 16-02-2005, 15:14

Saa lenge det ikke er noen informasjoner om last eller pax skulle det ikke vaere noe problem ...

15-02-2005, 15:08	#1
Superhai ScanFlyer Rusty Join Date: Sep 2004 Posts: 5,483	SGS for 2004 SGS best result ever 2004 SGS result for 2004 was MSEK 279, SGS best result ever. All SGS regions have contributed to the positive development, which is MSEK 352 better than plan. The positive result is due to volumes and products, activities transferred from SAS Technical Services as well as some major one-off financial effects. SGS revenue increased to MSEK 6 211, which is 11 percent better than 2003. The unit cost continues to decrease in all SGS regions: by 9 percent during the last two years. Productivity is also better than planned. The volume of weighted landings was at 545,343 slightly over budget. Full Time Employees were 7,028, which is 179 less than plan. Price pressure on the market The ground handling market has been under severe price pressure during 2004. A trend is appearing where airline alliances choose a common ground handler. All agreements with SK/BU were handled regionally within SGS, with support from the central KAM organization. In connection with the negotiations it was established that the three Scandinavian SGS companies should establish joint projects with SK/BU to identify savings that can give SK lower prices. A first phase of these projects shall be ready during the first quarter of 2005. Many customer contracts were renegotiated during the year. There were also a number of new customer airlines, of which the larger contracts were with Pakistan Airlines in Manchester and with Virgin Atlantic for CDC services in Bangkok. A hectic 2004 In the beginning of 2004 a number of tasks within aircraft servicing were transferred to SGS from SAS Technical Services, including staff, equipment and customer contracts. SGS established own ramp handling in Helsinki August 25. SAS Ground Equipment was transferred to SGS from SAS Technical Services July 1. In connection with the incorporation October 1, SGE was formed into regional companies in Scandinavia, with the Danish one as holding company. SGS was legally made into a Group within the SAS Group October 1. By the end of the year it contained SAS Ground Services AB as a holding company and eight subsidiaries: SGS Denmark AS, SGS Norway A/S, SGS Sweden AB, SGS Finland Oy, SGS UK Lt and the three SAS Ground Equipment companies. IS/IT issues PACS is SGS' common system for check-in. Due to instability, the introduction of the system caused operational disruptions, but by the end of the year these were eliminated considerably. A revision was made of SGS IS/IT cost. A savings potential of MSEK 116 was identified, and more than half of it was achieved 2004. The rest will be achieved 2005. Outlook for 2005 Since the airline market struggles, the demand for lower prices will continue in 2005. MSEK 296 remains to be achieved in Turnaround 2005, in part together with the Scandinavian Airlines/Braathens companies through LCC+ projects. In 2005, SGS is expected to make at least a 2004 financial "repeat performance". If you have any questions concerning the information above, please do not hesitate to contact Ann Billberg <mailto:Ann.Billberg-Jonsson@sas.se>. COPYRIGHT © 2002 Scandinavian Airlines System. Created by Elaine Boivie Published by Elaine Boivie Last updated 2005-02-11 __________________ “I always wonder why birds stay in the same place when they can fly anywhere on earth. Then I ask myself the same question.”

15-02-2005, 15:14	#2
CK ScanFlyer Mile High Club Join Date: Sep 2004 Location: Asker Posts: 11,487	Re: SGS for 2004 ok, da har tydeligvis flyselskapene i gruppen betalt for mye for sine tjenester... __________________ Christian H.F. Kamhaug Flypodden.no VOLARE NECESSE EST

15-02-2005, 16:17	#6
LN-MOW Flyklapper Join Date: Sep 2004 Location: KGRD Posts: 58,406	Re: SGS for 2004 !!!! Hva med en FRACT ogsaa ??? __________________ Andreas Mowinckel enfb.net Airliners at Fornebu Radar Station KGRV3

15-02-2005, 19:18	#7
fkrlf ScanFlyer Blue Join Date: Sep 2004 Posts: 175	Re: SGS for 2004 Vel pengene går i samme kassa lell... Dessuten har jeg inntrykk av at SGS er konkurransedyktige på handlingen også. Meget bra resultat er det dog.

15-02-2005, 21:49	#9
morr ScanFlyer Blue Join Date: Sep 2004 Posts: 238	Re: SGS for 2004 noen som vet hvordan det gikk for SGS Norge ?Og er det noen av selskapene i SGS som taper penger?

16-02-2005, 08:33	#13
Klippe ScanFlyer Blue Join Date: Oct 2004 Posts: 291	Re: SGS for 2004 Dette er faktisk veldig bra. Med de marginene bør det være liv laget den dag SGS eventuelt trekker seg ut av SAS gruppen. SGS ansatte har da intet å frykte!

16-02-2005, 15:14	#15
LN-MOW Flyklapper Join Date: Sep 2004 Location: KGRD Posts: 58,406	Re: SGS for 2004 Saa lenge det ikke er noen informasjoner om last eller pax skulle det ikke vaere noe problem ... __________________ Andreas Mowinckel enfb.net Airliners at Fornebu Radar Station KGRV3

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Braathens 2004 - 2007	LCH78	Bilder & foto	16	28-10-2011 20:22
C-5 Galaxy Gardermoen 2004	JanSev	Bilder & foto	9	10-11-2009 21:38
SAS i 2004	OSLflyer	Register- og ATC-Forum	3	18-09-2008 16:56
NB 2004 -120mill.	Jan	Flyforum	6	15-02-2005 15:00
Oktober 2004	PP	Flyforum	3	09-11-2004 16:03