OY-JET Cessna Citation havari

[Seabee]

http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=ba2_1178965069

Noen som vet hvor og når?

EDIT:

Fant dette;

http://www.alexisparkinn.com/photogallery/Videos/2007-2-25-CitationInDrink.mpg
*** Accident occurred Sunday, May 15, 2005 in Atlantic City, NJ

NTSB Identification: NYC05LA085 REPORT AT
http://www.ntsb.gov/ntsb/brief.asp?ev_id=20050526X00676&key=1

The pilot performed "a low pass" over the runway, and then touched down
approximately 1,000 feet beyond the approach end of the 2,948-foot long runway, with a tailwind of approximately 10 knots. After touchdown, the airplane continued off the end of the runway, and subsequently impacted water. According to the Cessna 525A Landing Distance Chart, an airplane with a landing weight of 11,400 pounds required
3,000 feet of landing distance, in a no wind situation. With a 10 knot tailwind, the airplane required 3,570 feet of landing distance. The published airport diagram for the airport, was observed attached to the pilot's control column after the accident. A notation, which read, "airport closed to jet aircraft" was observed on the diagram. Additionally, the same notation, "Arpt CLOSED to jet traffic," was observed in the FAA Airport/Facility Directory. Examination of the airplane revealed no mechanical deficiencies.

The National Transportation Safety Board determines the probable cause(s) of this accident as follows:

The pilot's improper decision to plan a flight to a runway of insufficient length, his improper in-flight decision to land on that inadequate runway with a tailwind, and his failure to obtain the proper touchdown point. A factor in the accident was the tailwind condition. *** See also
http://aviation-safety.net/database/record.php?id=20050515-0

[Lund]

http://www.hoejesteret.dk/hoejestere...pilotfejl.aspx
Dom afsagt den 2. juni 2015
Weibel Scientific A/S
mod
Nordisk Flyforsikringsgruppe

Forsikringssum udbetalt efter flyhavari skulle tilbagebetales, fordi havariet skyldtes groft uagtsomme pilotfejl

Højesterets flertal fastslog, at piloten havde udvist grov uagtsomhed ved at lande på den pågældende flyveplads, at havariet skyldtes den groft uagtsomme pilotfejl, og at kravet om tilbagebetaling af forsikringssummen var berettiget. Weibel Scientific skulle derfor tilbagebetale forsikringssummen til Nordisk Flyforsikringssgruppe.
/T