Flyprat - View Single Post

RWY 24 · 02-10-2010, 06:54

Nesten riktig

Litt lenger ned i artikkelen står det:

The three variants were originally called the RRJ-60, RRJ-75 and RRJ-95, with the numbers designating the average passenger capacity of each type. However, with the renaming of the project to Superjet 100, the RRJ-75 was relabelled the Superjet 100–75 (or SSJ 100–75 for short), while the RRJ-95 became known as the SSJ 100–95. The smallest variant, called the SSJ 100–60, was temporarily postponed, and efforts are currently concentrating on the largest variant, with the smaller SSJ 100–75 to follow later.

Så det skulle bety at dette er en SSJ 100-95, hvor "95" antyder gjennomsnitlig passasjerkapasitet.

02-10-2010, 06:54	#4
RWY 24 Legal Eagle Join Date: Feb 2010 Location: Oslo Posts: 1,560	Nesten riktig Litt lenger ned i artikkelen står det: The three variants were originally called the RRJ-60, RRJ-75 and RRJ-95, with the numbers designating the average passenger capacity of each type. However, with the renaming of the project to Superjet 100, the RRJ-75 was relabelled the Superjet 100–75 (or SSJ 100–75 for short), while the RRJ-95 became known as the SSJ 100–95. The smallest variant, called the SSJ 100–60, was temporarily postponed, and efforts are currently concentrating on the largest variant, with the smaller SSJ 100–75 to follow later. Så det skulle bety at dette er en SSJ 100-95, hvor "95" antyder gjennomsnitlig passasjerkapasitet.