View Single Post
Old 08-03-2008, 15:18   #13
LN-KGL
ScanFlyer Mile High Club
 
LN-KGL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Oslo, Kiev og Dnipro
Posts: 8,547
Default Re: Boeing 787 kan stå foran ytterligere forsinkelser

brendas, det var vel litt spåklige finurligheter og ordspill du ikke forstod her - og jeg har ikke sagt noe om at Dreamlineren er et prosjektmareritt. Men det ser ut til at jeg har mine ord i behold - allerede 22. august 2007 spådde jeg på et nærværende forum A.net følgende:

Quote:
http://www.airliners.net/discussions...-KGL#ID3573208
Do I sense a change of tone from one year ago or am I wrong?

I would say we have to prepare our selfs for a late Dream - maybe a more realistic EIS would be at the start of the winter season 2008/2009? Even that schedule would be a tight one if you look at the latest records of Boeing wide bodied twins:

767-200: ff 26 Sept 1981 eis 8 Sept 1982 = 11.5 months
767-200ER: ff 6 Mar 1984 eis 27 Mar 1984 = 21 days
767-300: ff 30 Jan 1986 eis 20 Oct 1986 = 9.6 months
767-300ER: ff 9 Dec 1986 eis 3 Mar 1988 = 14.7 months
767-400ER: ff 9 Oct 1999 eis 14 Sept 200 = 11.2 months
777-200: ff 12 Jun 1994 eis 7 June 1995 = 11.8 months
777-200ER: ff 7 Oct 1996 eis 9 Feb 1997 = 4.1 months
777-200LR: ff 8 Mar 2005 eis 3 Mar 2006 = 11.8 months
777-300: ff 16 Oct 1997 eis 27 May 1998 = 7.3 months
777-300ER: ff 24 Feb 2003 eis 10 May 2004 = 14.5 months

Average of all the above = 9.7 months
Average of the first of type = 11.7 months
Average of the last two projects = 13.2 months

In addition to all that new technology for the 787, the trend has to be broken big time if Boeing is going to deliver in May.
Riktig nok var dette allerede før første bekreftede forsinkelsesmelding fra Boeing, så jeg tok litt for lite i med forsinkelsen. Men jeg får si det selv siden ikke andre gjør det, det VAR en god spådom!
__________________
Kurt
Vi flyr LOT
LN-KGL is offline